Home | Login | Recent Changes | Search | All Pages | Help
PreCedingsThree014Donnella Meadows wrote an article titled "Places to Intervene in a System" that was published in Whole Earth Winter 1997. It included the following points nine items.
(the numbers actually go from 9 to 1, but I haven't figured out how to do this on the wiki.) You can find a PDF copy of the entire article at http://www.donaldegray.com/Articles/PlacesToIntervene.pdf It included the following points nine items. #9. Numbers (subsidies, taxes, standards). Wow, what an article. SherryHeinze 2003.10.26 Just reread an article which describe a process-adoption experience viewed by some as a success and others as not so successful. Those who saw the new process was a success felt that they had gone through a paradigm change, and the ones who didn't think it was so successful were still operating in the old paradigm. Their summary: If you believe that quality comes from inspecting defects out, you don't need a tool for building quality in. If you believe that man-hours are the measure of success, you don't need a tool for delivering more value with fewer man-hours. If you believe projects are basically predictable, you don't need a tool for managing unpredictability. If you believe that social interaction is a small variable in project success, you don't need a tool for improving communication. This paper is "Learning by Doing: Why XP Doesn't Sell" by Kay Johansen, Ron Stauffer, and Dan Turner, available at: http://averagecompany.com/pubs/LearningByDoing.pdf --KeithRay 2003.10.30
Updated: Thursday, October 30, 2003 |