Home | Login | Recent Changes | Search | All Pages | Help
SessId014From Novice to Maestro: Enhancing Your Personal Influence Becky Winant, Jerry Weinberg "Man's spiritual creativity is not manifested by his philosophies, creeds, theological dogmas, or political systems, not in his wisdom, nor in his foolishness; it is manifested by the way he affects and transforms the world." - from the I Ching Many of us hope to influence the world around us. In organizations, we propose projects and hope that they will be funded. In project teams, we advocate approaches and hope that they will be adopted. Each of us hopes to see our actions influence events to achieve a desired goal. Some of us call ourselves consultants and attempt to help others do this. Others of us do this and have titles that reflect organizational roles. In fact the consultant's skills belong to every effective person. This session is about amplifying our effectiveness in influencing the world around us. It explores our native and learned skills, and our individual strategies for fostering our personal evolution from novice to maestro. Becky: I'm very excited about working with Jerry and all of you in this session. I've been a consultant for a while (decades). Over these years I have met many wonderful people who, as my client, influenced me tremendously. Some of my favorite work as a consultant has been to encourage the talent of my colleagues working "behind the lines". That was my initial inspiration for this session. I'm curious to hear what you want to discuss. Jerry: Nynke Fokma just gave me a great idea that we might use in this session. To get in touch with attitudes about offering advice in return for pay, we can establish "quarter-consultants" who ask to be paid twenty-five cents for each piece of advice they offer at the conference, or just in this session. Becky: Good idea, Nynke! Here are Jerry and my initial design ideas for this session:
Topics: Structure: Nynke: independent of the "quarters" I feel there might be a key for me somewhere in this session. When I feeltrace it, I find two centers: the I Ching sentence and the Authority thing. In dissociation states I can transform my perceptions (reflections of World), in association states I can transform World??? Does the "control centre" shift that easily? How about not really seeing what is in World? Not really understanding words until I ununderstand them, not knowing how someone else will (un)understand my words, images, actions? There is something here ... and I just can't grasp it. And the authority thing simply scares me! Nynke, Jerry once said that your effect is as much a result of intent as specific abilities. This resonated with me as I had heard that before from my Shiatsu guy, Ron. As I apply my Shiatsu lessons I experience this, and I am a novice. When my hands rest on a person we are connected. My intent to do good is in my focus of how I envision say, back muscles being stretched and moved. I can ask that person "What is happening for you?" to confirm my sense and assure my desire to do no harm. What you are there to do comes through and while you may not transform as a master might, you do no harm and may do some good. If you're interested you can read my article on the Shiatsu-Consulting relationship. Its on the AYE Articles and Essays web page (ayeconference.com). I hear in your words a sense of knowing through touch -- feeltrace. This seems to be a ways you connect to your truth. Your strength. Authority scares to me, too. If someone calls me an authority, my inner voice says - well, I really don't know as much as x, and I still have a LOT I can learn. If someone is presented to me as an authority, it sounds like I am expected to defer -- something I don't do well, because a challenge can be fun. Then the defer and the challenge reaction create a deadlock. Authority suggests power and mastery. When I have met people who are truly powerful masters, I have been affected by what I perceive as their almost imperceptible touch. It seems a form of magic. A dance. Ron, my Shiatsu guy said to me recently - Have you noticed how much gentler I've gotten? I said I hadn't. He said - Oh yes, over the past two years I can accomplish something with much less force. But, two years ago he was effective for me, his client! I think we each affect the world every day. It is different today, right? You already affect the world. Please don't panic! - BeckyWinant Becky, Thank you for your reply. With what you wrote (and my recent communications with Jerry) I think I can untangle a part of my I Ching sentence ununderstanding I use "feeltracing" to figure out my ??? when reading Words. For ununderstanding Images I use "dimensionjumping", and find myself looking at or traversing spaces/connections/flows ... And I feeltrace while I am doing this. It's at the tip of my memory and when I look, it's gone? Early attempt: Dreamer states and Body states share/have common substates?? By the time I "get it" I'll probably realize something has been "staring me in the face" ;-) The Authority thing possibly has to do with a "created/fixed" reference system vs my "being/floating" version. I think this session is going to be fun and full of ununderstandings for me! Great!! - Nynke From JamesWard: I originally thought I understood what this session was about, but now I'm not sure I understand what the goal is here. It seems that we're getting quite far afield from:
From Nynke: James, I need to understand what goes on inside myself first, before I can bring it back and be more effective as a problem solver that gets paid by the hour. The process of "tracing my own interpretations and values in the equation" I call ununderstanding. From there I can see where my processes are not as effective as could be. It's like finding the right needles in a haystack (filled with other needles as well) - (become more aware). In the description of the session I see: (associate value ... aha!) As "outside" facilitators Becky and Jerry may guide me through the haystack much quicker than I could alone. Both are (good) facilitators, and in order for me to get the best from that "function" I have to share some parts of these processes, to provide them with information for feeling/seeing/hearing where I am. And to someone else, such initial communication may look like "getting quite far afield from". I see it more as an "initial divergence" to get an overview and from there in work situations I can be like a hawk and, depending on the actual context, converge and apply what I have learned, capturing that one mouse hiding in the haystack ... (and diverge again (for association of value and further learning!) when it doesn't seem to have the desired effect ;-) And I am only taking up a little bit of space on this forum, for my interest in learning about Authority and Money incentives/responses in my consulting. From JamesWard: As effective as Nynke's reply was in clarifying her terminology and expectations, it does not help me understand what I will encounter if attend this session. Is it primarily directed at techniques in dealing with inner conflict about getting and giving advise, or is it about tools and techniques for becoming an effective consultant (not necessarily mutually exclusive). However, if a person does not feel comfortable in giving advise (especially for money) why would they voluntarily seek a consulting role? As for being considered an "authority," why would a client consider retaining a consultant who was not considered an authority? If I don't actively pursue a course of action designed to promote myself as an authority, who else will? James, You correctly identified that inner conflict about getting and giving advice relates to tools and techniques for becoming an effective consultant. At AYE we want the participants to be involved. And, as you probably know through your own work, the people you work with help, along with you, solve their problems. This wiki exchange will be helpful to Jerry and me when we next meet to work on our session design. So thank you! Interesting question: why would someone seek to be a consultant if they are uncomfortable giving advice? I've heard people say that they want to help others by using expertise they have or that they want to work independent of a system that requires a code of behavior they don't agree with. Or both. Discomfort may arise from making a change from doer to advisor or from employee to independent. Many, like Nynke, many express a fear of doing the wrong thing. Some, like Wayne meeting Alice Cooper (in the movie Wayne's World), feel unworthy to be given a position of esteem. There are as many other reasons and feelings as there are people interested in this topic. I'd guess anyone seeking the path of consultant is also seeking information, advice, reassurance and more experience. Here's my take on authority: Certainly, authority in the sense of expertise and experience is important. Here's a question back: How much do you think is needed? -- BeckyWinant From JamesWard: OK, I'll wait until you and Jerry clarify the content of this session. I might suggest, however, that many of the inner conflict issues could be addressed in SessId025, which seems to be explicitly about this. That would leave this session for those of us who have crossed that bridge and want to be more effective as consultants. I am not certain that I correctly identified that inner conflict about advice relates to tools and techniques for becoming an effective consultant. I did say that they may not necessarily be mutually exclusive. I think that most of us dealt with this "before" we decided to become consultants and not "while" we are attempting to consult. I am sure that you also recognize that not everyone who works independently or on contract is a consultant. As you point out in the intro to this session, many of the same potential conflicts arise when moving from doer to manager in an organization. By my definition, consultants are retained by clients largely because of what they know, they are recognized experts or "authorities" in some area. Contractors, on the other hand, are retained for what they can do, and normally do not have consultative or advisory responsibilities. As far as authority goes, I think we are talking about different meanings in the same context, that is, being recognized as "an authority" as opposed to exercising authority in a consulting or managerial context. When I teach a seminar on project management, I talk about something I call the "dimensions of authority," only one dimension being the formal authority vested in a person by virtue of his or her position in an organization. In truth, project managers and consultants almost always have far more authority than they really need to accomplish their mission - provided they understand and appreciate the sources of that authority and how to apply it. James, Thanks for your added comments. To create a perspective I think this session is about advisory roles and also about personal influence in a broader sense. It isn't primarily about inner conflict. As you may have noticed there could be overlaps in the discussions for many session in this conference. I agree with your statement that managers and consultants often have more authority than they need to accomplish their mission. I'm curious about your opinion on the relationship between authority and personal influence. Do you see the two as always related...or not? Do you expect that project managers or "wizards behind the curtain" (as in OZ) would be in this session? Also what responsibilities lie with the consultant?--BeckyWinant From JamesWard: I think that authority and personal influence are separate, although personal influence can and should be used to enhance authority. However, personal influence can extend much further and take on a life of its own. I can't tell you how many times I as a consultant have been able to make contributions that have had nothing to do with my assigned areas of authority or responsibility. One of the things very senior executives have to deal with is the unintended consequences of the influence they wield within an organization. An offhand or light hearted aside may trigger large efforts on the part of subordinates who, well intentioned, misinterpreted a remark. I don't see much demand for "wizards behind the curtain." We do have to get paid for what we do, after all, but maybe I'm misunderstanding what you mean by "wizards." As for project managers, one of the things I am wrestling with is whether as a project manager I am acting as a consultant or as a contract employee. Project management just happens to be one of the roles I play quite frequently, as I assume you do as well. As for your last question about responsibilities of the consultant, I don't think I grasp your intent so I can't really respond. James, I apologize for the delay in responding. My reference to the wizard behind the curtain was a suggestion that some people are given the role (or assume it) of influencing without assuming explicit credit. I think any role any of us plays might fit under the umbrella of consulting. The discussion of consulting and contracting is a whole other interesting path. What are differentiating aspects? Are they significant from the point of view of the client or of producing results? What potential pitfalls and strengths do you associate with each? -- BeckyWinant One of major reasons I chose to attend this conference is that I want to obtain more consulting and fewer contract assignments. To oversimplify, I think contract employees (employees paid hourly rather than on salary) are extensions of staff. They may be short term or long term and they work under the direction of client management. Functions may be no different from that of permanent employees and roles are not immediately discernable from those of employees. In my last management position, I had 32 contractors on staff and considered none of them to be consultants. As I said above, these persons are employed mainly for the skills they possess - what they can do. Consultants, on the other hand, are usually brought in to address specific issues or problems. Assignments are normally of shorter duration and, I would think, carry significantly higher billing rates than contract assignments (at least that's been my experience). Assignments usually end with submission of a report and/or presentation containing advice and recommendations to management. Consultants do not usually work under the immediate direction of client management (at the task level) but have a broader charter and manage their own work. Again, to oversimplify, these persons are retained mainly for what they know, not what they can do. In fact, they usually don't perform specific tasks for the client. Many contractors, both independent and employees of firms, call themselves consultants, but, as a famous person once said, "You can put a cat in the oven, [but that] don't make it a biscuit." On the other hand, maybe we're all talking about the same thing, with only differences in semantics. I'd like to hear JerryWeinberg's take on all of this. JamesWard Jerry responds: My take on all this is that the session will be driven strictly by input we get from participants. It's my intention to show how to be an effective consultant, and to show it at two levels:
To the previous submitter, first an apology for jumping in where not asked. Next a question that jumped out when I read: "In my last management position, I had 32 contractors on staff and considered none of them to be consultants. " In the context of your interest in discovering how to be a consultant (by your terms) instead of a contractor (by your terms) - why, when you were a manager, did you not hire a consultant (or two) instead? -- BeckyWinant Sorry, Becky, I thought I had signed that last entry and that it was part of our ongoing dialogue. The answer to your question is easy. We had a staffing philosophy that we would bring in contract employees who had specific skills for a period of time in order to enhance our flexibility, e.g., when we were modifying and implementing a purchased payroll package, we retained several contractors who had experience with that package, but only for the duration of the project. This policy also gave us flexibilty to quickly change the size of our staff as demand for our services (or our budget) changed. We really didn't need any consultants at my level, although my boss's boss retained some to audit our department and advise him on a course of action - a typical short term consulting assignment that culminated in a report with specific recommendations, the most important of which, I might add, were ignored. JamesWard Hi, James. It seems the contractor gets treated like an employee and the consultant has their advice ignored! Obviously a consultant might bill higher rates and work shorter jobs, but is the main difference in your mind the part about giving advice and recommendations? If so, what stops someone from rewriting their promo material to say: I can advise you in these areas, as opposed to saying: I can do these things for you? (I'm really not trying to be dense here, just exploring boundaries and barriers). BeckyWinant You are, of course, correct in what you say. The problem I have encountered is in finding consulting assignments as an independent. These types of assignments seem normally to go to the big firms. There are, of course, exceptions, and I think that some of the presenters at the AYE Conference are among those exceptions. I think JerryWeinberg would be a prime example of what I am talking about. I think the main difference is that when working as a contractor I find that I am taking project level or task level direction from client management. I usually work on or manage projects. As a consultant, I am expected to manage my own work and generally do not perform project work. I am trying to address a problem - and, of course, it is always a people problem and I get paid by the hour. Again, we may be just talking semantics here but I do think there is a difference between contract employees and consultants. JamesWard The whole idea of being a maestro is that you're not a victim of big consulting firms, or of anyone else. So, for example, you know how to make yourself worth having (more than the gray-suited MBA clones) and then how to market yourself for those things. Many would-be maestros want to do everything but market themselves - that's like a maestro pianist who doesn't want to play certain notes. You have to play them all, and we'll be open to dealing with problems in all areas - so you can see whether we're maestros or not. This doesn't mean we know everything, but we do have a pretty good idea of what we don't know, and what's important, and where to go for important things we don't know. - JerryWeinberg This discussion has been interesting reading. With regard to my interest in this session, I am particularly stymied by providing advice that has been specifically asked (i.e., I was hired to give it), and then having it ignored or changed. I know that this is always a possibility, but the human factor always amazes me. What also interests me is the effects based on my advice that can occur beyond my control (having just read JerryWeinberg's "Secrets of Consulting" I am clued to leaving my ego at the door). For example, I have just been working on a project where I made recommendations which by the time they were implemented had taken on a different life, but the terminology stayed the same. What was disturbing in this instance was that the terminolgy was being used incorrectly but has now become part of the client's culture. I'd like to figure out how to prevent this from happening next time or at least make it more difficult. So, I am hoping to find some helpful discussion that will spark an epiphany of sorts about influence, when and how. -- AnnaAllison Anna, this is exactly the type of problem we'll deal with. Just to give you a hint, there's a basic principle that says: If you're not there, you haven't a prayer. IOW, unless you arrange follow-on consulting to monitor your recommendations, there's no chance that they'll actually follow them in the way you intended. So, this is first of all a contracting problem. After that, we'll discuss the rest, but if you're not going to be there, you can't do it by intertial guidance. - JerryWeinberg Jerry, I am still at this client site and can't get the terms unstuck. They are going to use the terms anyway because they now "know" them and the teams that they manage understand what their managers mean when they use them, even when they know they are wrong. Then, like dominoes, the staff use the terms incorrectly because there is now a common usage horizontally and vertically throughout the organization. I am looking forward to exploring this situation and possible solutions at this session. --AnnaAllison 2003.05.02 JerryWeinberg: I'm looking at this page again for the first time since 2000, and I'm crying. AnnaAllison participated in the first session, then the following Septemer 11, she was killed by terrorist on a plane that crashed into the World Trade Center. When I told her, If you're not there, you haven't a prayer. little did I know that before long, she wouldn't be there for us much longer. I think we still have a lot to learn from Anna's sacrifice. Life is too short to let anything stand in the way of your becoming your own Maestro. Please say a prayer for Anna, then say one for yourself - and get on with the job of making a wonderful person and transforming this to a better world. We need you. Return to NewSessionDescriptions
Updated: Saturday, May 3, 2003 |