Home | Login | Recent Changes | Search | All Pages | Help
WhatJohannaWouldTeachNewProjectManagersHere's the context. This proposal is part of a graduate management degree. The assumption is that the students have not formally managed projects yet. The degree comes in two flavors: a two-year program (Fridays and Saturdays biweekly), and for masochists, a one-year program, which is every Friday and Saturday. The sessions are 9-12 and 1-4, with a 15-minute break in the middle. First year content: Introduction to project management
Grading:
Second year content: Managing project complexity
Grading: 3 homeworks, each worth 25% of your grade Project management journal in which you write which decisions you made when under which circumstances. 1 exam worth 25% of the grade
JohannaRothman 2003.03.09 - - - - - - Good material here. My suggestion would be to put the "Managing Yourself and Your Reactions" up near the start of the course. DwaynePhillips 9 March 2004 Dwayne, I have a concern that it's taken me several days to figure out how to say :-) When I became a project manager, I was absolutely positive that managing me and my reactions was just not an interesting problem. Even after I'd managed projects for several years, I still was sure project management was about the tasks and the other people. (I can now laugh out loud at this.) I don't know how to sell people on the idea that their actions and reactions are just as necessary to manage as other people's interactions -- until they've already tried managing projects and kept a journal. Do you know how to sell people on this part of the soft side of project management before they've managed any projects? -- JohannaRothman 2004.03.14 Here is a nice slideshow [since the URL is broken, I removed it, which also has the nice side-effect of restoring line-wrap to a meaningful margin. --DaveLiebreich 2004.03.11] You have to get it from the cache since it seems restricted on the website (is it going away soon?) Sorry, the cache copy is gone. It was a slideshow of management issues that focused more on interpersonal then the administrivia. It was compatible with but different from the AYE conferernce isues. KenEstes March 11,2004 Would there be any advantage in introducing the class to various management SilverBullets and how to manage a project that produces artifacts that support reviews by external agencies? I am thinking of fun things like ISO 9000 and CMMI? If the structure to support outside review is in place early enough the data production would be straightforward and unobtrusive. It is my experience that if the data has to be produced after a project has started, the Satir foreign element is introduced and the subsequent chaos can slow things down a lot. CharlesAdams 2004.03.12 Charles, good questions. I've had two experiences with auditable projects. When the process police don't have to participate in the projects, the processes are unsustainable and deadly to the project. When the process definers are the project participants and they understand why the process artifacts are necessary, the process is not onerous, and easy to maintain. I have noticed the data problem also. But I don't think it's limited to collecting data after the project starts. After all, PMs and others change which data they collect when during the project. I think a lot of the problems arise when people think they'll be measured by the data, and they work on making their measurements improve their lot in the company. JohannaRothman 2003.03.12 Hmm, I don't see the words "customer", "client", or "owner" anywhere in the outline. And I don't see the words "outcome" and "benefit". Defining who is the customer(s) is crucial for project communication. The customer may prefer to receive information differently than I do. The PM that adapts to the customer's preferences will connect better with the customer. Part of the PM's job is to help the customer continuously sell the project to their management. If the PM doesn't help the customer define the outcome and their benefits, then a selling tool is lost. I suspect that you may have much of the above points in your charter and scope section. But I feel that focus on the customer deserves its own section. And those ideas deserve to be talked about first. I believe the outcome that the PM should focus on is the creation of a satisfed customer rather than creation of a lot of documents. The documents too often become the end point rather than the means to an end (satisfied customer). SteveSmith 2004.03.12 Steve, thanks. The customer parts are embedded in the scope part, and you're right, they are not nearly explicit enough. I'll have to think about this more (how to expose the stuff I talk about in the course in the outline). JohannaRothman 2004.03.12
Updated: Sunday, March 14, 2004 |